Zlatko Pleše
Die Wurzel
allen Übels Vorstellungen über die Herkunft des Bösen und Schlechten in der
Philosophie und Religion
des 1.–4.
Jahrhunderts.
Ratio
Religionis Studien III
Herausgegeben
von Fabienne Jourdan/ Rainer Hirsch-Luipold
Tübingen.
Mohr Siebeck 2014, pp. 101-132. (pdf.)
Fragment
„A great deal of recent
scholarship on Gnosticism has been concerned with dismantling this modern
typological coinage1 – a misleading label, so we are told, that reifies a wide
array of diverging theological positions, ethical orientations, and ritual
practices. The present study, as indicated by its title, does not follow such a
radical deconstructionist program. While acknowledging numerous doctrinal
divergences in the available primary sources, it still argues that multiple
Gnostic traditions share a distinctive world-hypothesis and a unified set of
presuppositions concerning the sources and nature of evil. Evidence for this
claim comes not only from original Gnostic works, mostly preserved in Coptic
translation, but also from a number of ancient anti-Gnostic treatises penned by
Christian heresiologists and philosophically-minded pagan intellectuals. The
first part of this study deals with various authors engaged in anti-Gnostic polemics
and with their surprisingly uniform account of the “errors” of Gnostic
theodicy. In the second part, this account will be tested against the selection
of passages excerpted from genuine Gnostic texts. Comparison of these two
bodies of evidence reveals a coherent doctrine of evil as derivative from a
spiritual source and permeating all domains of a multiple-layered reality.
Underlying this doctrine is the systematic application of a principle of
transitivity and homologation, which postulates “the same structure in the
universe and in each living creature” (Plot. Enn. II.9.7.25–27)” (pp. 101-102).
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu